Interactive demonstration farm

See your next move across the whole farm.

More land changes more than field work. Explore the crops, machines, grain facilities and cash behind one connected plan.

Fictional examples. Nothing is saved.
Your sample operation

Meadow Ridge grain farm

Central Plains–Pembina Valley, Manitoba · 2026 · CAD
Productive land3,000 acres
Total property area
3,200 acres
Tractors
3
Combines
1
Sprayers
1
Grain carts
1
Grain trucks
2

A fictional non-irrigated Manitoba crop farm. Published benchmarks inform the budget; its rotation, machinery, field layout and financing are chosen example assumptions.

What if you added more land?

Added land
Season
Current productive land3,000 acres
Planned productive land3,563 acres

Added productive land: 563 acres

Compare your approach

What changes for the farm?

Use the farm’s existing machines, crew and grain facilities.

What this approach includes

The existing fleet handles the current and added land. Any seasonal or connected grain-flow shortfall remains visible until a workable plan is established.

Planned productive land: 3,563 acres. Annual cash change: -CAD 71,252. Cash needed: CAD 1,697,250. Capacity needs attention.

This plan needs more capacity.Grain handling and storage is short by 551.1 tonnes in Peak autumn inventory.Why this result?
Tightest capacity check: Grain handling and storage · Peak autumn inventory
Current need
3,327.3 tonnes
Planned need
3,951.1 tonnes
Available
3,400 tonnes

Peak marketable grain retained after planned sales. Wet-buffer storage is separate and is not added to dry-grain capacity.

What changes the annual cash
Change in crop receipts
+CAD 346,148
Change in cash outgoings
+CAD 417,401
Annual cash change
-CAD 71,252

Cash outgoings include operating costs, ownership costs and loan payments.

The cash result assumes the full crop is produced and sold. Resolve capacity shortfalls before relying on it.

Annual cash change-CAD 71,252After operating costs and loan payments
CAD 359,944CAD 288,692
Cash needed for the planCAD 1,697,250Upfront investment + seasonal funding allowance
New borrowing: CAD 2,835,000
Cash outgoings / productive acreCAD 534.34Includes loan payments
CAD 495.39CAD 534.34
Limiting resourceDry-grain storageResolve the shortfall before relying on the cash projection

Cash projection is conditional on completing the work. A capacity shortfall does not automatically reduce crop receipts in this example. Before income tax and household withdrawals. All amounts are illustrative CAD.

Explore what drives the result

Select a machine or open the numbers. Every view uses the same farm plan.

Representative equipment imagery. Work rates and costs use the example assumptions.

Field work

Harvest

Grain handling

Example basis & sources

Planning year 2026 · Assumptions reviewed Oct 26, 2026

A fictional non-irrigated Manitoba crop farm. Published benchmarks inform the budget; its rotation, machinery, field layout and financing are chosen example assumptions.

  • Manitoba 2026 crop budgets

    Crop yields, deferred-delivery prices and individual seed, nutrient, protection and insurance budgets. These are planning guides; insurance uses 2025 rates.

  • Manitoba 2026–2027 farm machinery guide

    Work-rate, fuel and separate ownership/operating-cost methods. Machinery sizes, used values and workflow allowances are chosen for this example; bundled custom rates are not added to owned-machine costs.

  • FCC 2025 farmland values

    Central Plains–Pembina Valley cultivated-land reference. The example weights that value by its productive share; this is not a valuation or a current offer.

  • FCC 2025 farmland rental analysis

    Manitoba's provincial rent/value ratio informs an illustrative rent. It is not a quoted regional lease.

Adjust the example assumptions

These are fictional planning inputs, not market quotes or manufacturer performance claims. Changes apply to the same current and planned farm so the comparison stays consistent.

Land
Finance
Production
Capacity

Results use the last applied inputs. Unknown or incomplete edits are never treated as zero.

Fixed farm assumptions

Current farm costs

Existing rent / total acre
CAD 160.00
Land taxes & insurance / owned acre
CAD 18.00
Farm overhead / year
CAD 30,000
Land improvement life
20 years

Current grain logistics

Existing fields · one-way haul
8 km
Average truck travel speed
50 km/h
Truck payload
30 tonnes
Load + unload / trip
0.45 h
Market deliveries · one-way haul
40 km
Market load + unload / trip
0.65 h
Grain-cart throughput
90 wet tonnes/hour
Handling energy / tonne
CAD 3.00

Usable work windows

Spring field-work window
230 h
First crop-care window
72 h
Second crop-care window
72 h
Third crop-care window
30 h
Summer harvest window
115 h
Autumn field-work and harvest window
230 h
Grain marketing delivery period
500 h

Hours available to each machine. Crew hours also depend on the number of operators.

Storage timing: 75% of wheat remains in summer and 15% in autumn, alongside 72% of corn and 60% of soybeans.

What is included in this model?
  • Fictional non-irrigated Manitoba crop farm, planned in CAD for 2026. Benchmarks are dated guides, not live quotes, farm records or manufacturer performance claims.
  • The farm has 3,000 productive acres within 3,200 total property acres. Cropped area drives production; total property area drives land purchase, rent and land ownership charges.
  • Crop budgets use Manitoba's 2026 planning yields, deferred-delivery prices and individual crop inputs. Insurance figures in that guide use 2025 rates; optional hail cover is not included here.
  • Modeled assigned hours separate productive work, travel and handling, operator support and waiting. They are not engine-meter forecasts or a complete daily work diary.
  • Field rates use width, speed and stated efficiency. Field movements, sprayer filling and operator setup are shown separately; the same allowance is never charged twice.
  • Harvest uses one combine, one cart and two trucks. Their connected workload includes finite wet-buffer storage; waiting has paid attendance but engines off in this example.
  • Dryer throughput and energy use a 25% incoming-corn reference, scaled by moisture removed and a handling limit. This is a simplified planning relationship, not a manufacturer drying curve.
  • Marketable yield is already at sale moisture. Wet hauling and drying preserve dry matter; storage uses the peak retained marketable grain, with separate wet-buffer capacity.
  • Annual market deliveries are modeled separately from field-to-yard movements. Grain retained after harvest is sold during the separate marketing period; prices are held constant.
  • Paid operators are charged once for assigned task hours, including waiting. Five available seasonal operators are not five full-year salaries; no additional owner-labour opportunity cost is charged.
  • Fuel and repairs follow active phases. Repair budgets include maintenance service; operator support covers setup and cleaning, without duplicating mechanic labour.
  • Fictional used-asset values, residual values and remaining lives determine straight-line economic depreciation. Insurance and housing are explicit value-based allowances; registration and facility upkeep are separate cash amounts.
  • Cash outgoings include principal and interest payments. Profit before tax includes interest and depreciation, excluding principal repayments. Land itself does not depreciate.
  • Seasonal funding is an upfront allowance, not a second annual expense. Existing debt retains its own rate and remaining repayment period.
  • Shared work windows and available crew are planning screens, not a dispatch schedule. Crop receipts remain conditional on completing work; no unverified yield-loss penalty is invented.